The controversy over public finances deepened after fuel subsidy savings suit was filed against Nigeria’s governors and the FCT minister.
The legal action is raising fresh questions about accountability and transparency.
The Socio-Economic Rights and Accountability Project, SERAP, filed the case at the Federal High Court in Lagos.
The organisation is demanding answers over alleged unaccounted trillions.
Fuel Subsidy Savings Suit Targets Governors, Wike Over FAAC Allocations
SERAP sued all 36 state governors and Federal Capital Territory Minister, Nyesom Wike.
The group accused them of failing to explain how subsidy savings were spent.
According to SERAP, the funds were received through Federation Account Allocation Committee disbursements.
The allocations reportedly followed the fuel subsidy removal in May 2023.
SERAP said the suit was prompted by public reports.
These reports claim that trillions of naira reached states as subsidy savings.
Despite the increased revenue, SERAP argued that living conditions have not improved.
It cited healthcare and education as areas still suffering.
The organisation stressed that vulnerable Nigerians remain affected.
It said public welfare has not reflected the scale of the funds received.
Fuel Subsidy Savings Suit Demands Full Disclosure of Projects and Spending
In the fuel subsidy savings suit, SERAP asked the court for specific orders.
It wants the governors and Wike compelled to disclose spending details.
The group is demanding project locations, costs, and completion records.
It also wants timelines and procurement details released.
SERAP argued that Nigerians have a constitutional right to know.
It said democracy depends on transparency.
The organisation added that secrecy weakens public trust.
It insisted that accountability remains non-negotiable.
According to SERAP, citizens deserve explanations.
Public money, it said, must benefit the public.
The suit was filed under case number FHC/L/MSC/1424/2025.
No hearing date has been fixed yet.
Why the Fuel Subsidy Savings Suit Matters to Nigerians
Observers say the case could set a major precedent.
It may redefine how public funds are monitored.
Transparency advocates believe the outcome will shape governance debates.
They say the suit highlights growing public frustration.
SERAP maintains that silence from authorities is unacceptable.
It insists that disclosure will restore confidence.
As the case awaits hearing, public interest continues to grow.
Many Nigerians are watching closely.
Leave a Reply