Senate rejects electronic transmission – The Labour Party (LP) has condemned the Nigerian Senate for rejecting a proposal that would make electronic transmission of election results mandatory.

The party described the decision as a shameful betrayal of Nigerians and a major setback for electoral transparency.

Senate rejects electronic transmission: Labour Party Expresses Outrage

In a statement issued on Tuesday, the Special Adviser to the Labour Party’s Interim National Chairman, Mr. Ken Asogwa, said the Senate’s action disappointed millions of voters.

According to him, the decision weakens public confidence in Nigeria’s democratic process.

He said Nigerians have consistently demanded credible elections, especially after the controversies surrounding the 2023 general polls.

Decision Described as Retrogressive

Furthermore, the Labour Party described the Senate’s move as one of the most retrogressive decisions since Nigeria returned to democracy in 1999.

Asogwa questioned the purpose of amending the Electoral Act while rejecting a key provision designed to improve transparency.

He argued that electronic transmission of results would reduce manipulation and curb irregularities during collation.

Lawmakers Accused of Self-Interest

In addition, the party accused some senators of placing political interests above the will of the people.

The Labour Party warned that such actions could deepen voter apathy and distrust ahead of future elections.

Call for Vigilance Ahead of 2027

Despite the setback, the party urged Nigerians not to lose hope.

According to the statement, citizens must remain vigilant at polling units and collation centres.

“With collective resolve and active participation, Nigerians can still ensure that their votes count in 2027,” the party said.

Senate Defends Its Position

Meanwhile, Senate leaders defended their decision.

They insisted that electronic transmission of results was not removed entirely but left to the discretion of the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC).

However, critics insist that failing to make the process mandatory weakens legal safeguards.

The decision has continued to attract condemnation from opposition parties, civil society groups, and pro-democracy advocates across the country.